tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6435218625905819100.post571628769205084114..comments2023-05-10T09:21:18.893-05:00Comments on Specology: APPLIED CLAIRVOYANCE – WRITING SPECIFICATIONS BEFORE THE DRAWINGS ARE DONESpecologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00870574712590092597noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6435218625905819100.post-54672403722558044112010-01-06T11:02:39.808-06:002010-01-06T11:02:39.808-06:00John, what wonderful insights and advice. I, too, ...John, what wonderful insights and advice. I, too, have given up on the Platonic ideal of completed drawings and the leisure to study them and write complete specifications based on "pencil down" drawings. Unfortunately, sometimes that means less than specific specifications! I've learned how to be somewhat vague, while not actually being misleading - "Install in accordance with manufacturer's written instructions", for example. And a Finish Schedule, whether on the Drawings or in the Project Manual, is genius. Everyone can breathe easier, especially if it's the client holding up things by not making final choices. <br /><br />When reviewing drawings, I tend to bullet point questions and observations in an email, sending one at the end of each day. This allows answers to be placed right next to the question and usually, no questions are missed. <br /><br />I request to be copied on all project correspondence; I can decide if I need to keep it. Working across different office locations makes this method of communication vital.<br /><br />Thanks for your tips and comprehension of what can be a frustrating and difficult process.<br /><br />LynnLynn Javoroski CSI CCShttp://www.flad.comnoreply@blogger.com